Return vs volatility: is the return worth the ups and downs?
The chart plots this fund against every fund in the same category. The vertical axis is return and the horizontal axis is volatility. Funds in the top left earn more with fewer swings.
Two funds may both return 8% a year, but one moves smoothly while the other swings alarmingly. This chart shows how much up-and-down each return came with, compared with funds in the same category. It is under "Go deeper" in the "Risk" section of the fund page, shown when there are funds in the group to compare with.
1Blue dot: the fund you are viewing
2Green dots: other funds investing in the same master fund
3Horizontal dashed line: the average return of funds in the same category
4Vertical dashed line: the average volatility of the funds shown on the chart
5Top left: high return with low volatility
The corner labels in the picture are only there to explain this article; the actual fund page does not show them. The 1Y, 3Y and 5Y buttons choose the period, and hovering over a dot shows that fund's name, return, volatility, AMC and expenses.
How it's calculated
Funds compared: funds in the same AIMC category, counting 1 share class per fund and only share classes for retail investors. There must be at least 5 funds with data for the period
Vertical axis, return = last NAV ÷ NAV at the start of the period − 1, including dividends. The 3-year and 5-year periods are converted to % per year
Horizontal axis, annual volatility = the standard deviation of daily returns over the period × √252 (roughly the number of business days in a year). The higher it is, the bigger the swings
Return per unit of volatility = return ÷ volatility. For example, ABC-A returned 8.2% with 11% volatility, giving 8.2 ÷ 11 ≈ 0.75, while a fund that returned 10.4% with 26% volatility scores only 10.4 ÷ 26 = 0.40
Above the chart is a line summarising the ranking, such as "Over 3 years, ABC-A returned 0.75 per unit of volatility, ranked 2 of 17 funds", sorted from highest to lowest
Return per unit of volatility is not the Sharpe ratio, because it does not subtract the risk-free return, such as bond interest. You can use it to compare funds within the same chart, but don't compare it with Sharpe ratios from other sources.
Reading a dot's position
Top left (above the average return line, left of the average volatility line): earns more than the group with fewer swings than the group. The best position
Top right: earns a lot, but you have to put up with big swings. Suits people who can tolerate volatility
Bottom left: small swings but low returns. May suit money where stability comes first
Bottom right: big swings but lower returns than the group. A position where you should ask why you are still holding it
Why it helps and how to use it
Choosing within the same category: if several funds give similar returns, choose the one further to the left, since you get the same return with less stress
Comparing funds that invest in the same master fund (green dots): these funds should sit close together. If one is clearly lower, check the expenses shown when you hover over the dot; the gap usually comes from fees or the currency hedge
Switch between 1, 3 and 5 years. A fund that stays in the top left in every period is more consistent than one that reached the top left in just one year
Use it together with max drawdown. Volatility measures the average daily ups and downs, while drawdown shows the single deepest fall. Two funds with the same volatility may not fall by the same amount
Only compare funds within the same category; equity funds and fixed income funds are in different categories. All the figures are past results and do not guarantee that a fund will stay in the same position in the future.
We count visits as totals without cookies, and never follow you from one day to the next. If you accept, we also use cookies to see how people use this site, so we can improve it. Privacy policy